Hotseat debates on the use of racial language in anger
(50 votes, average: 4.44 out of 5)
Loading ...Posted on: August 22, 2012
Posted in: Interviews, Video
Carlos Cortiglia features in this recent interview for VoxAfrica. Notice the way Carlos brings another dimension and further facets to the appeal of the British National Party. Also take note of the African host having the integrity to pull up Evening Standard columnist Nelson Abbey as he routinely lays the blame for every misfortune in his life at the feet of the white community.
Of course no white host would dare to do such a thing and Mr Abbey seems genuinely surprised and shaken that his own deeply embedded racism is exposed and his arguments turned on their head.
Related Posts
Highest Rated Videos
- Contribute (5.00 out of 5)
- Welcome to the BNPtv Website (5.00 out of 5)
- Jack Renshaw speaks at Blackpool rally (4.81 out of 5)
- Shocking! No Platform Policy (4.81 out of 5)
- Remembrance Sunday 2012 (4.79 out of 5)
- The Crossroads (4.79 out of 5)
- Justice for Charlene – Karen Downes Full Interview (4.78 out of 5)
- Bigoted Labour – No Respect! (4.78 out of 5)
- EU- Shale Gas and Oil Debate (4.77 out of 5)
- EU- There was no ‘Treaty’ (4.76 out of 5)
August 22nd, 2012 at 3:00 pm
well done carlos {this man should be doing more for bnptv}
upton upon seven
August 25th, 2012 at 1:37 am
Nelson Abbey, in common with all non-White colonisers, has conveniently forgotten whose ancestral homeland, Britain is. It is not the ancestral homeland of Arabs, Indians, Negroes and/or Orientals. It stands to reason and common sense, therefore, that the indigenous peoples of any land should come first – in everything.
Ask President Zuma of South Africa, ask the governments of every country in Africa who and only who would be entitled to come first in their own homelands?
Now, what non-White incomers into ancestral White homelands must be made to recognise and respect is that they are not entitled to special privileges and elevated status (supremacy) over White people in White people’s ancestral homelands anymore than White incomers into black homelands would have any rights to elevated status (supremacy) and special privileges over black natives in theirs’ and that’s assuming the slim possibility that Whites were ever granted equal parity with the native Blacks or full citizenship in the first place.
Would black governments allow the setting up of White special-interest movements and institutions in black countries?
No, they would not consent to it.
Would black governments permit the creation of a White-controlled race relations board replete with the power to enact legal proceedings against native black self-interest groups/institutions for supposed racial discrimination against Whites due to their policy of only admitting indigenous Blacks in attempts to rightfully preserve their race, cultures and traditions?
Most definitely, no such development would ever be permitted to get off the ground in black countries.
Would any black group/institution be forced by black governmental decree to admit Whites into their rank(s) with equal entitlement to run for election as its head(s) for example, backed up by threats of withdrawal of livelihood and subsequent financial ruination and/or imprisonment for non-compliance?
Would black governments permit Whites to form political parties or represent districts in established black parties including being let stand as candidates in national elections?
Absolutely no in both scenarios.
So, all of that said, every White nation in line with black ones have, therefore, also the absolute moral right to withdraw privileges from non-natives and reserve them only for their own indigenous brethren.
Marxist Liberal dictat based on wholesale racial discrimination and race-hate against, in this case, the indigenous British people(s), is recognised as a crime against humanity and is thus illegitimate and illegal which means White people are not compelled to continue enduring and thus suffering the imposition of such injustices (crimes). Instead, White ethnonationalist leaders are completely justified in commencing legal proceedings against the obvious criminals that comprise the British ruling elite based on multiple crimes committed against the indigenous British peoples and the territory of the United Kingdom as follows:-
Genocide, Treason, Sedition, Subversion and Embezzlement/misappropriation of public funds.
In conclusion, lest they forget since Blacks and non-White natives of other lands saw fit to banish White colonisers from their respective homelands, the same choice is also the prerogative of White peoples in their respective ancestral homelands too most especially in view of the culpability of their successive government officials.
August 26th, 2012 at 10:09 am
When the ‘Other three’ mention about slavery.. Do they mean the 1.25 million white people who were murdered hundreds of years before the black slave trade and hundreds of years after by BLACK SLAVERS?
BARBARY PIRATES NEVER GET A MENTION or the MUTILATION OF WHITE CHILDREN IN THE NAME OF ISLAMIC IN AFRICA.
August 26th, 2012 at 11:21 am
A Swain, I thought your comment was brilliant. Very, very simply put that we should not be subjugating ourselves to any incomers. I would like you to write more articles for the main BNP website. I would hope your articles would be well received.
August 27th, 2012 at 4:25 pm
Nelson Abbey <— total racist! everything he said about 'prejudice' he was doing it himself!
Carlos, me, Helen all useful idiots…. and proud to be
They are terrified of the BNP being a party for the UK. We will be and put a stop to N Abbey and his friends wicked deeds and money making scams!
N Abbey said his family 'came' to the UK.. more like ran from their own kind…… but now they are here, they going to make sure they cause as much RACISM as they can! also the people who were here before his family 'came' here without those people being asked first and they were known as British people… noe thanks to his lot coming… we no onger a 'race' we are the victims of racism not blacks or asian….
Gary & Helen BNP members & BNP Veterans member.
I have started a petition via avaaz for PR, please sign it and spread the link.
http://www.avaaz.org/en/petition/Proportional_representation_PR_for_United_Kingdon_Elections/?cviaedb
August 27th, 2012 at 5:13 pm
Just who are the racists here ?.
August 27th, 2012 at 6:24 pm
Nelson Abbey came across to me as nothing more, and nothing less, than a bigoted racist. I concur with george harris that A swain’s comment should be put on the BNP main website. It’s brilliant.
August 27th, 2012 at 10:57 pm
And, misinformed idiot that he is, Nelson Abbey doesn’t even know that Copeland was NOT a member of the BNP at the time he carried out his lone attacks.
August 27th, 2012 at 11:38 pm
The only very unpleasant and biggoted racist in this interview was without a doubt Nelson Abbey. The chilling fact is that he did not even consider the possibility that he himself is a classic example of a dangerous type of racist.
August 28th, 2012 at 9:33 am
Bigoted and racist? I guess that’s why I’ve lived in Asia and still have Asian friends there, I work beside immigrants and treat them as I would anyone else I work with. If they do something to offend me, I will turn my back on them just as I would anyone else. I have heard it so many times by ex-pats who have said they were never racist until they came back to Britain.
Nelson seems to be the racist and bigoted one to my point of view. He has absolutely no concept of people becoming more mature and reasonable and also stereotypes everyone based on the colour of their skin. His is the typical attitude I have come to expect from black people, “you are white so you are racist.” Isn’t that attitude racist in itself? Carlos mentions, “the things we don’t say,” I think Nelson made his point for him almost as soon as he opened his mouth.
Racism is a word that is being used far too much and for reasons that have absolutely nothing to do with race. For example: Being lazy at work will get you the sack. There’s nothing racist about it, it’s classed as Gross Misconduct and applies to EVERYONE. You are not being targeted because of the colour of your skin, you’re being targeted because you’re lazy. The rioters in Tottenham got away with so much because the police were told to hang back because it’s racist to stop them. Since when has it been racist to arrest a criminal or to stop a riot taking place?
Sorry, but my view is that the word “racist” is being heavily abused by those who want to do whatever they want and get away with it. Can you wonder why so many people have so little respect for immigrants?
August 28th, 2012 at 10:11 am
As far as anger goes, it is something that removes all rational thought. It just isn’t possible to moderate your language if you are angry. Anyone who says they can is a liar.
Mustapha and Nelson both have a view of the BNP from the lies they are told in the media. Neither of them have met or talked with a few members to find out any different, nor do they even want to. Safe in their small minded world, they can believe what they want. They both have the same narrow minded views and nothing will ever convince them otherwise, using stereotyping and events long ago when the National Front was at it’s height to justify their opinions of the BNP today.
August 28th, 2012 at 11:44 am
If you are not an advocate of multiracialism then you will be labeled as a “racist”. In this case I think we should admit if we are not in favour of multiracialism and say that it is not then bad to be “racist”.
August 30th, 2012 at 1:41 am
when you talk about racism,how the rappers that use the N world most frequently are not demonised,
and are aloud to say what they want.but if a white guy say’s the same world he a racist…..even if its in jest or throwing back a slur that’s put upon him..
we all know john terry has black friends…so where do you draw the line..
August 30th, 2012 at 10:55 am
Carlos has done well to maintain a serious conversation with an un-useful idiot called Nelson who is so hard done by that he has been given a job by a national newspaper to express his racist view. To me listening to Nelson Abbey proves beyond any doubt that ‘Reverse Racism Is rife and the ‘Evening Standard’ is a paper that should be avoided for promoting racialism.
Red
September 2nd, 2012 at 11:03 am
Well done Carlos, you came across very well we need sensible debates on racism.
September 2nd, 2012 at 12:10 pm
i must disagree with the term “reverse racism”.above.it itself implies that only whites can be racist,and therefore it is a racist comment itself.i never use such wording.you must call a spade a spade.
September 4th, 2012 at 12:45 pm
Well done Carlos!
September 26th, 2012 at 8:02 pm
The Weekly Standard panelist used the “33 %” more likelihood that Blacks will be racially profiled by police as evidence of institutional racism. What he leaves out of the discussion is that Blacks in the UK (proportional to their population) are significantly overrepresented in blue collar crime stats. In jurisdictions like London, they represent the numerical majority of all blue collar violent crime offences.
If you’re extremely over-represented in crime stats (as UK Blacks are), you would expect this to increase the negative perceptions and stereotypes about members of your group being crime prone, which should contribute to racial profiling from police.